Yes - I could purchase a FM radio-in-an IC for $2.00 and be done in 35 minutes, but what would I learn?
Repository for FM superhet receiver experiments conducted from 2012 to 2014.
1. 10.7 MHz IF Filter Experiments
2. A Basic Colpitts VCO
3. DC-DC Converter for VCOs
4. Miscellaneous Photographs
1. 10.7 MHz IF Filter Experiments
As a FM receiver design newbie, I read about and experimented with some 10.7 MHz IF filters to learn common practices, what's available and which measurements might help me to reach my goals. Over time, I've collected a variety of crystal and ceramic filters for hopeful future work. Click for 2 exotic examples. IF filters might be purchased at Ham festivals, surplus electronic parts stored and/or online. Prior to paying for a filter, I've found it useful to politely request a sweep of the filter, or, better yet, perform this task myself. To sweep a filter in your lab, you'll need a tool such as a spectrum analyzer with tracking generator, a VNA, or some other analog/digital sweep system.
I'll homebrew some crystal filters for narrow band FM in future installments — I ordered some 20 MHz xtals.
Sometimes a filter in your junkbox will state the IF and perhaps the 3 or 6 dB bandwidth, but not the input/output port termination impedance. How do we determine this impedance? I've learned we can figure this out by testing differerent termination resistors with this simple test jig:
Above — A simple crystal or ceramic IF filter sweeping jig. Since the series resistors attenuate the signal, losses occur; but the shape should look clean with minimal ripple. Normally, we builders will also place (or switch in) 50 Ω attenuator pads on both the signal source and detector within our sweep system to buffer impedance mismatch. Comparisons of this simple jig with more precise and complicated matching methods suggest that for many filter sweeps, it might work fine.
Above — My test jig with a Murata ceramic filter soldered in-situ. Keep the resistors close to the board. I've pretty much moved to SMA connectors in my lab: they're cheaper than BNC, plus we can buy a wide variety of quality 50 Ω patch cables donning various connectors for low cost. For example, a 30 cm cable with a male BNC and SMA connector on either end.
Above — A poor termination may result in improper bandwidth and ripple — easy to spot in this trace. Click for a trace from a 'gone bad' instrumentation crystal filter: 10.7 MHz @ 30 KHz with 2200 Ω Z in/out. Not really usable with ~ 10 dB ripple.
Above — Older 280 KHz Murata 10.7 MHz IF filters purchased long ago. Low cost = their main attraction, although they too will suffer total obsolescence and a price increase.
I bought some newer, lower insertion loss ceramic filters in the following bandwidths: 280 KHz, 230 KHz, 150 KHz, 25 KHz and 20 KHz. Check their datasheet — most Murata ceramic filters require a 330 Ω termination (preferably resistive) and I keep a filter sweeper jig with 270 Ω resistors as a regular bench tool. 280 KHz was a popular WBFM filter bandwidth in many older high-end FM receivers including my 1980's T-85 Yamaha receiver; my benchmark FM receiver.
Many of us hopeful FM builders, smitten by modern digital gear, fail to recognize the fantastic design achievements made by FM receiver engineers back in the day. All those air-variable, ganged band-pass preamp stages, low noise amplifers and often incredibly complicated and great sounding FM multiplex circuits just blow me away. Perhaps I'm a hopeless analog nostalgic? My T-85 sports 5 ceramic filters [280 KHz and 230 KHz B/W Muratas] and the narrow filters are listener switchable for narrow band Dx.
Ways to Match These Filters with Amplifers
Above — A common gate JFET amplifer drives a 330 Ω ceramic filter. I placed 2 resistors in parallel to get the needed shunt R of 1320; my 2 resistors measured 1316 Ω. The bifilar transmission line transformer provides the 330 Ω Z to drive the filter. Details of the JFET amp come in a later schematic, but the input return loss at 10.7 MHz = 23 dB. I swept this circuit and it looked similar to the tracing with the same ceramic filter in my 270 Ω filter sweeping jig. This particular filter exhibited 6.4 dB of insertion loss.
Above — 2 versions of a BJT amp with a 330 Ω input and output impedance. If you read schematics of good FM receivers, often the designers drive the filter with a 330 Ω collector resistor. Click for an example. By keeping the bias and degeneration resistors low and the current moderate, an amplifer with 330 Ω input Z is easy to design [although the input Z will vary with Beta].
I felt surprised that version A exhibited a voltage gain of 11.7 despite those low bias and collector resistors. You can stick a filter on either side as shown. Murata recommends a buffer amp between cascaded ceramic filters and you'll see this often in FM receiver schematics from the 1980s or so. Resistors provide wideband termination. Version B is the same amp with a little more degeneration to lower the gain and serves as a design example. I've got the procedure documented here under 'Calculating the input resistance of a common emitter stage'.
Above — An IF block using the designs shown earlier. I terminated this stage with a 270 Ω resistor and of course removed the mixer and diplexer. 2 sweeps lie below. I'm tempted to tune the JFET drain and couple the transformer with a few links as needed to get a 4:1 impedance ratio. Anyhow — food for thought.
Above — A sweep of the IF block shown above left sans the mixer + diplexer (two 280 KHz ceramic filters). On the right lies the trace of the common gate amp driving a single 280 KHz filter with its output terminated with a 270 resistor. The advantages of 2 cascaded filters seems apparent, although the slight downward dimple at the center frequency might represent some capacitive loading at the output of the common gate amplifier.
I built a number of other amplifers and swept all of them Click or click for 2 early examples that use active devices instead of series matching resistors on the output. In these circuits, R Term was changed and then the circuit was sweeped. The tracings looked good.
Above — I built Brian, K6STI's nJFET IF amp. He used it to offset the losses associated with 2 ceramic filters. Click for Brian's fabulous website. I placed 150 KHz 3dB BW filters before and after a J310 and swept — my circuit exhibited a 2 dB net loss which seems quite reasonable.
The 330 input resistor is a load/termination on the input filter and will dissipate some energy and lower the AC input voltage to the gate compared to the usual high Z input resistors we apply in our JFET common source amps — from open circuit to full termination would incur a 6 dB voltage drop. Still, for simplicity versus performance, Brian's circuit looks hard to beat.
Above — 2 ceramic filters in series. I added a small trimmer between the pair in hopes to mitigate any filter skirt distress or ripple. Click for a tracing with and without the trimmer capacitor. You might experiment with the filter coupling and the filter block termination impedances to better their skirts and passband The losses of the above filter block may reach 12-14 dB.
If you don't have a sweep system, I was able to crudely test the amplifers + filters with my 10.7 MHz signal generator and a DSO.
If you go with a BJT IF amplifer, it's possible to measure the input
impedance with a bridge and tweak the emitter current and/or degeneration
resistor to get very close to a 330 Ω Zin. I keep a drawer with
through-hole resistors rated between 1 and 10 Ω for tweaking my
emitter resistor values to change series feedback in my common emitter amps.
I first designed a simple 330 Ω bridge for measurement with my DVM. It worked, but the null lacked the depth and resolution we need. Later I improved the sensitivity by adding another coil and changing to a 'scope or SA detector, but after building EMRFD Figure 7.36, I abandoned my bridge. Figure 7.36 just blew me away. The null of a 330 resistor was only a few 10s of microvolts during calibration.
I placed a small 500 Ω pot in parallel with a 120 Ω resistor for the variable resistance. After some basic testing, I calibrated it with a 330 Ω resistor; adjusting the pot for the deepest null and just left it there for testing my 330 Ω IF amps @ 10.7 MHz.
I plan to make Figure 7.36 for VHF and maybe UHF with chip caps plus a small screwdriver adjustable trimmer pot [to get the lowest possible L] calibrate it and make it a part of my test bench arsenal. After getting a null, we measure the pot's resistance with an ohm meter to learn the impedance at the ? port
Considering that our predecessors measured just about everything RF with a bridge, this little circuit suddenly become relevant. A series L and C "add-on" circuit shown as Figure 7.39 may be placed in series with the ? port and device under test to deepen the null in the face of reactance. Bridge circuits form the very essence of RF measurement. Yes Bobby, we can measure impedance without a VNA.
2. A Basic Colpitts VCO
Above — My completed Colpitts VCO. I installed the unlabelled, left-sided pot in case a potentiometer is required for future AFC circuitry changes. It's not hooked up.
I reviewed some 1970's FM receiver schematics to learn that before PLL-locked VCOs dominated, often Colpitts VCOs were locked onto a strong frequency with Automatic Frequency Control (AFC). Local oscillators tanks often employed a inductor plus an air variable capacitor that tuned from ~77 to 119 MHz with a varactor for AFC. All the tuning and front-end filter air variable capacitors were ganged together and I'm sure alignment took some skill.
Some VCOs tuned with varactor(s) instead of an air variable cap — this is what I wish to do. Varactor tuned VCOs usually suffer more thermal drift than air variable capacitor versions.
AFC compensates for VCO thermal drift by a seperate varactor with its control voltage line DC coupled to the FM detector through an R-C low-pass filter. Any difference between the VCO frequency and the desired FM frequency produces a proportional DC voltage. The DC control voltage changes the oscillator to the desired frequency by re-tuning the AFC varactor within this feedback loop, albeit over a limited range. AFC is unsuitable for weak signal DXing, since it may pull the receiver onto a strong adjacent signal. Many 1970's FM receivers supplied an AFC defeat switch.
I remember 1 old FM receiver in my parent's home that stayed locked on 1 frequency for years thanks to AFC.
Above — The schematic of my version of a JFET Colpitts VCO (with AFC) that lacks the standard gate to source feedback capacitor; the intrinsic capacitance from the J310 gate to source provides the feedback needed for oscillation.The 8.2 pF bypass cap was determined on the bench — too little, or too much C decreases output voltage, or snuffs out the oscillator.
I just couldn't bring myself to make a VCO with a BJT, since on my bench at least, they suffer more thermal drift than JFET-based oscillators. I built with a mixture of SMT and hole-through capacitors and resistors. The anti-parallel arranged hyperabrupt varactors were found on eBay. Click for a rear photo of the project chassis. The gold colored jack is an SMA connector.
I bench designed this VCO and it took many hours to find the correct amount of L and C for the resonator to give a low distortion, sine wave output across the ~21 MHz tuning range. This meant soldering in and removing these tank components frequently. Click for the lowest frequency output. Click for the highest.
In the example local oscillators I reviewed, the engineers made no attempt to level off the signal that normally increases in AC voltage as you increase frequency. I also ignored levelling. Presumably the designers didn't worry with leveling the oscillator output in their superhet receiver as long as the output voltage sufficiently drove the mixer into complete switching. Levelling would add cost and complexity. This isn't a lab grade RF signal generator — that's for sure.
At present, the AFC varactor pair is disconnected since I won't know how strongly to couple it with Cx until I have a working detector. Also I will need to experiment to determine the best R-C time constant for the low-pass filter; likely the 2.2 uF capacitor will need an increase in value.
With the 3K9 Ω resistor under the 5K tuning pot, I keep at least 5 VDC on the tuning varactors or the VCO would stop running as I tuned the pot towards CCW. The coil = about 3 turns of 16 gauge wire on a 5/8 inch bolt. (Despite Canada going metric in ~1975, they still sell nuts and bolts in inches at our hardware stores). The stiff wire prevents the inductor from turning into a "microphonic" spring when the VCO is bumped. Click for a photo. The nominal L = ~ 125 nH, although I bent and manipulated the coil so it sat attached to the copper clad board with no tension and then squished or expanded the turns to establish my lower band edge.
In many FM receivers, either a single or balanced dual-gate MOSFET mixer was driven by a high impedance buffer/amplifer. If I mix with a 2-gate MOSFET, I'll insert a common gate JFET amplifier on the IF strip to boost the LO output impedance and AC voltage.
The feedthrough capacitors are 0.0047 μF - they were on sale so I bought them. To prevent a parasitic high impedance when placed in parallel with my standard 0.001 μF bypass caps, I placed a series 10 Ω resistor.
I enjoyed this crazy design; trying to replicate a relic, but popular local oscillator idea from decades ago. Let's hope I did it justice. Perhaps future VHF stuff on the FM and even 2 meter band will involve an Si570 and PIC, Arduino or other microcontroller? This simple VCO will do for now. My greatest passion lies in designing and building the front end.
3. DC-DC Converter for VCOs
Until now, I ran a maximum reverse DC voltage of ~12 volts in my varactors. For wider VCO or L-C filter tuning, builders may chose 28 volt varactors such as the BB535 or BB149A and boost the 12v supply up to 28v with a DC-DC converter. Some build inductorless converters made from 555 timers, or use CMOS voltage converters like the CL7662, Si7661 to make a doubler. As an RF constructor, I like working with coils and built the following circuit:
Above — My regulated 28v converter for varactor tuning adapted from a
design by Matjaž, S53MV. I
pulled this circuit from his amazing 2-part article with circuits that span from 11 GHz RF
to DC. See the reference articles below. I filtered heavily and at switch-on, my circuit
draws ~ 50 mA, but then drops to ~ 11 mA after the capacitors charge. The 10K
[set VDC] trimmer pot allows you to dial in your desired DC output voltage and thus this
converter may work
over a wide range of DC supply voltages.
The tuning control(s) might be a single potentiometer, or even seperate pots for tuning 2 different VCOs. In this schematic, I show a 10K coarse tuning in series with a 500 Ω fine tuning potentiometer. R keeps some minimal reverse DC on the varactor(s) and is optional.
The oscillator frequency varies slightly with the set output voltage. Click for a screen capture at 32 VAC with a 10X probe placed on the PNP emitter. In another test, with no load, I watched the coils's magnetic field collapse and ring in this cool 'scope capture. This is why I love deep memory DSOs so much.
Above — Andy, G8ATD who owns VHF Communications
magazine granted me permission to show the DC converter circuit. His magazine archives provide a treasure trove of useful circuits from VHF to
Microwave and it's clear Andy passionately spent lots of time publishing the magazine until 2013, plus scanning and organizing the archived
Although VHF, UHF and microwave focused, much of the concepts and learning can also enrich your HF exploits.
Above — A "quicky" VCO thrown together to test the DC-converter. Click and click for the output with the tuning pot set to fully CCW and then CW. The 680 R keeps about 2 volts on the varactors with the tuning pot set to CCW.
In the reference articles cited above, you'll find 2 HF-VHF Hartley VFO designs that tune over a 20 MHz span thanks to 28 volt varactors and careful design. In yet another UHF circuit, a 1 octave tuning span is realized with the author's specially designed VCO. Truly hardcore design from a great teacher — I crave exposure to the work of such authors.
Above — A photo of my "quicky" VHF VCO. 73!