Junk Box NDB Low Pass Filter
With winter approaching, many HAM and SWL hobbyists find intrigue in tuning
in NDB or
Although the tunable NDB band depends on your
location, in Canada it may be found in a band ranging from about 190 to
Canadian beacons either have just a carrier (no offset)or are tuned using the USB with about a 400 Hertz offset, however, different offset frequencies and certainly LSB are used when receiving DX from other countries.
Less than 10 Km away from my QTH is a 10 KW AM radio station at 1150 KHz. On my test receiver, the S-meter reads off the scale (> 60 dB over S-9) when tuned to this frequency. This local radio station causes spurious, second-order intermodulation products (direct mixing) that all but wipes out some weaker NDB stations that I am trying to tune in. Certainly, having a 500 Hertz crystal IF filter is useful, but attenuating this local QRM is also desirable and is the topic of this web page. Many general coverage receivers offer limited or in some cases no filtering of the NDB band, however an outboard filter is an easy project to build in one afternoon.
Update Oct 11, 2010: Here is a link to a version of this project built by Robert, K5TD
To the left is the project schematic. It seems odd to build a low pass filter to reduce BCB interference (as usually a high pass filter is required for this purpose at HF) however for NDB, an aggressive low pass filter is required. For simplicity sake, a 7 element Chebychev low pass filter was chosen. Since it is easy to wind reasonably high-Q inductors for 10 uH and greater inductance using number 61 material on a ferrite torroid, the FT50-61 core was chosen for all of the inductors. Number 22 gauge wire was used for the coils to keep the unloaded Q as high as possible. The FT37-61 ferrite is also suitable, but will have less Q and require smaller gauge wire. Use 19 turns instead of 17 for the 20.2 uH and 21 turns instead of 19 for the 24.1 uH coil. Do not use number 43 material ferrite cores.
I do not stock RF capacitors greater than 2200 pF, so junk box ceramic
capacitors were used to build this filter. In fact, this design specifically
uses more common, standard value capacitors to reduce cost and to not have to order in
parts. Certainly, the astute builder could use higher quality capacitors or even
large powdered iron torroids instead of the ferrite cores for inductors if
higher performance is desired.
Try to use high Q capacitors if you can find or are purchasing them. Poly or
silver mica caps would be great choices. You can substitute a 5000 pF capacitor for the 4700
pF called for in the schematic.
To the right is a photograph of the components I used in the project breadboard.
To the left is the completed project. Ugly construction as always, was used. The inductors were spaced at least 2.5 cm (1 inch) apart at right angles to try to minimize unwanted coupling.
Above is the plot of the filter during simulation with GPLA. The simulation
calculated an attenuation of ~46dB at 1150 KHz. At 1000 KHz the signal was 40 dB down, at 800 KHz it was ~24 dB down and at 630 KHz, the attenuation was only ~5.7 dB! Clearly this filter is not suitable if the offending BCB interference is
from a station significantly less than 0.8 MHz. For my
situation, this filter is acceptable. A 5 element Chebychev filter was also
designed and plotted but was discarded as there was only 32 dB attenuation at 1150 KHz.
Since I wanted to tune as high as 535 KHz, the 533 KHz cutoff frequency was chosen. Additional work to help those with strong BCB interference at the lower BCB will be attempted in the future and presented on another web page.
Receiver Testing and Comments
Click on the picture to the left to hear the beacon YWB at 389 KHz with a 500 crystal hertz IF filter engaged on a borrowed Icom R-75 receiver. W7ZOI did some measurements on his R75 receiver S-meter using a signal generator and step attenuator. From S9 on up to 60 over, the steps were very accurate. However, below S9, correlation was poor. The built in attenuator is -20 dB when engaged. On my test receiver, I did some A/B testing with the filter in or out. For 1150 KHz (without the low pass filter) I had to engage the receiver's attenuator as without it, the S-meter reads off scale. With the attenuator engaged, the S-meter reads 50 dB over S-9 when tuned to 1150 KHz.
With the filter connected between the receiver and the feed line, (and the attenuator engaged) the S-meter read S-9.This is a drop of about 50 dB at 1150 KHz which means that this filter pretty much works as designed. I love the Icom R75 receiver; it is good value with it's many features in a compact package. Further testing was undertaken on other frequencies.
When listening to WWV; At 2.5 MHz, without the filter, the S-meter read S-9. With the filter inline, I could not hear WWV or see any S-meter reading. At 5 MHz without the filter, the S-meter read was at 20 dB over S-9. With the filter inline, I could still hear WWV very faintly, but the S-meter did not register. There was little noticeable attenuation at less than 700 KHz when using this filter.
Additional Photos and information
Shown above is the completed project in a Hammond die-cast case with SO-239 connectors at each end.
Shown above a photo of the Skookum beacon SX. It is on 389 KHz. This NDB is located in Skookumchuck BC, Canada
My friend and fellow NDB enthusiast, Ken, VE7KPB has a posting on his web site showing some of the beacons he has logged from his QTH. Consider trying some of these frequencies from your own QTH to get used to finding beacons. Note you must temporarily allow pop ups to see his excellent log.
We recommend this non-directional beacon search and log utility program called WWSU from VE3GOP It must be registered and is a wonderful low cost tool.
I was near beacon L in Balti, Moldova (Балти, Молдова) in 2006. Below is a snippet from the VE3GOP program showing beacon L and also some nearby beacons. ( Я изучаю русский язык ). Приветствую Вас дорогие друзья!