Diplexers Topics

Introduction

My original web page on diplexers was rather incomplete and received some criticism from electronic engineers albeit the focus of this web site is "popcorn" designs. Wes Hayward, W7ZOI provided me some excellent schematics, analysis and simulations for diplexers which terminate doubly balanced mixers and these are presented below. After this section, the W1JR Bridge-Tee RF Diplexer from the original QRP HomeBuilder diplexer web page is presented along with new commentary and simulations by W7ZOI.

The final section presents a practical diplexer for terminating a product detector. All graphical images labeled as Figures 1-24 are copyright and property of W7ZOI and may not be presented elsewhere. Updated September 23, 2000.


W7ZOI Diplexer Notes

The usual amplifier is a two-port circuit. That is, it has an input port consisting of two terminals and an output consisting of two more. One terminal (ground) can be shared between the ports. Many filters are also two-port networks, including most of the ladders networks we use so often. Many other networks have three or even more ports. A common example is a mixer, which has three ports. Another example of a three port network is a diplexer. This linear network is usually designed around two port filters where one end of two different filters are paralleled to form an input port. This is illustrated as Figure 1. The purpose of a diplexer is usually to force a frequency constant impedance to occur at the input port, even though we usually only use one of the two output ports for signals. The simplest form of diplexer uses a pair of 1 element filters, a low pass and a high pass. This is shown in Figure 2.

Where the equations give the L and C that provide a perfect match. The angular frequency is called the cross-over. A familiar example is the cross over used in audio systems. The network that splits signals is a diplexer. Here is an example where both outputs are used. Another form of diplexer is the band pass/band-stop combination. This is shown in Figure 3:


Let's now consider further some examples, some that work and some that don't work as well. First, let's look at an audio diplexer that follows a product detector in a DC receiver. The load of interest is the first audio stage, which has a 50 Ohm input resistance. The diplexer offered is Figure 4. Note that this is not the combination of filters. It just looks like a low pass with an extra resistor. The response of this circuit is shown in Figure 5. The transmitted signal never gets up to the desired 1 volt in the low pass passband while the impedance match, represented by reflection coefficient, never gets down to the desired zero. The response is just that of a lossy low pass filter.

In 2012; Click on many of the diplexer images to see the original sized version

 

The normal filter circuit without the extra resistor is Figure 6. The corresponding output response is shown in Figure 7. Note that the transmitted signal is now up at 1 while the reflection is down to zero, both within the passband. Transmission goes to zero while reflection is 1 in the stopband.

 

Now let's use the low pass and put a high pass with it to try to form a diplexer. This is shown in Figure 8 where we now have just guessed at component values. The response, shown in Figure 9, has high pass and low pass outputs that we might expect. The match is good at the frequency extremes, but is only so-so in the transition band.

 

Let's now look at a carefully designed pair of two element filters. The circuit is Figure 10 an is a final example. The corresponding response is Figure 11. It is hard to see, for the response merges in with the baseline. However, the reflection is zero and it is zero everywhere. This filter was designed for a 1 kHz crossover, so it can be scaled to other frequencies with ease.

 

Figure 12 is another final audio example. This circuit is very similar to the one used in the past by Roy Lewallen, W7EL, although the inductor was smaller at 100 uH in his Optimized rig. The response of this diplexer is shown in Figure 13. This is not perfect, but it is probably quite a good performer in typical receiver situations.

 

Finally, here's a higher frequency example. 5th order low pass and high pass filters are combined. The filters have a cross over at about 150 MHz. Note that there is a slight reflection in the transition band. This is probably just the result of our having rounded some values in the design process. Figures 14 and 15. An outstanding reference on this is Nic Hamilton, G4TXG, "Improving Direct Conversion Receiver Design," Radio Communications, April 1991.

 


Bridge-Tee RF Diplexer

This is an excellent bandstop/bandpass diplexer popularized by Joe Reisert W1JR. This easy to build diplexer has a low parts count and is easily built using Ugly Construction. Resistors R1 and R2 present a 50 ohm impedance to the mixer output and a 50 ohm impedance to the input of the post mixer amplifier. The IF frequency is passed through the diplexer while out of passband RF is given a low impedance path to ground. The capacitance for C1 is generally built up by substituting the nearest standard value capacitor or by placing 2 or more capacitors in parallel with each other to achieve the desired value. The same procedure is then repeated for the C2 capacitance. For more strenuous purposes, a portion of C1 and C2 or the inductors L1 and L2 can be variable and adjusted on the bench. The inductors can easily wound on powdered-iron toroid cores. I have used T50-2 or T50-6 type toroids with good results. The Q of the inductors is 1.
It is possible to design a more generalized form of this diplexer with a higher loaded Q in the resonators. The diplexer shown and used in the program has a Q of 1. This was used by W1JR in his VHF/UHF World Column in the now defunct HAM Radio Magazine for March and November 1984. It was also more recently used by Jacob Makhinson, N6NWP in his A High-Dynamic Range MF/HF Receiver Front End in QST for February 1993. The actual formulae for this diplexer is far more complex than the simplified formula shown below or used in the program, but both provide a very good approximation for the Q = 1 version as used by W1JR and N6NWP. If you wanted Q=10, the series tuned circuit would use L that is 10 times as high with C to resonate. The parallel tuned circuit would then use C that was 10 times higher with L to resonate.
A supplemental web page with some hard-core mathematics for this diplexer can be found on the Diplexer Supplemental Page.

Simplified Formulae (Q = 1):
R1 and R2 are always 51 ohm resistors.
Inductors L1 and L2 -> 50 / (6.283 * frequency in Megahertz)
Capacitors C1 and C2 -> 1 / (6.283 * 50 * frequency in Hertz)

Example 1: For a 9 Mhz IF , L1 and L2 = 0.88 microhenrys and C1 and C2 = 350 picofarads
Example 2: For a 4.92 MHz IF , L1 and L2 = 1.62 microhenries and C1 and C2 = 647 picofarads

I wrote a simple program to do the math for the Q = 1 version.  Download the Bridge-Tee RF Diplexer Diplexer Program


Comments and analysis by W7ZOI

This is a double ended version of the first order bandpass/bandstop design presented earlier. But it's a good one, within the constraints of what it can do. The first is the simulation schematic for the diplexer, which is better termed a Bridge-Tee Diplexer. (There are bridge Tee filters and attenuators too.) That figure is entitled Figure 16.

 

The response for this circuit is shown in Figure 17. This is extremely good. The through response is very flat owing to the low Q of the series tuned circuit. But even better is the match. It is very good. Indeed, it would have been perfect except for slight roundoff errors that occurred as we designed the networks.

 

This kind of thing works fine if you really have a perfect match following the diplexer. But what if you don't. There are some places where they do not do the job that some folks think they will do. For example, a diplexer WILL NOT cause the impedance to be flat if it is followed by a filter. The diplexer must still be properly terminated at both output ports. In Todd's usual applications, he is worried about providing a good mixer termination for a product detector. The audio amp that he uses will usually have a common base first stage and that will present a good wideband load to the diplexer, so he is okay. But other folks have placed a diplexer after a switching mode mixer that then drives a narrow filter. The diplexer then does little good. To illustrate this situation, I designed a "crystal like" two pole LC bandpass filter with a 50 kHz bandwidth. This represents the general case where we try to put a diplexer between a mixer and a filter. The filter response by itself is shown in Figure 18. The schematic for the diplexer and following filter is in Figure 19.

The response for the combination is in Figure 20. Here we see a passband response that is fine; it's just the repeat of the filter response we already saw. However, the input impedance looking into the diplexer, the impedance that would be seen by a mixer, is terrible. The return loss is 0 dB at all frequencies except where we get within the passband of the filter.











Practical Diplexer for Popcorn Receivers

Building a diplexer to follow a product detector is not a cheap endeavor. Audio inductors and capacitors such as metalized polyester film types are not common in many builder's junk boxes. I really like the design shown in Figure 10 and wished to use it because it uses just 2 inductors and capacitors which is in keeping with the popcorn nature of this website. The main difficulty is that the inductors and capacitors are not standard value types and series connecting components to achieve the desired values would add to both the cost and size of the finished product.

Obviously, it will not likely match from DC to daylight. That is not the intention of this simple design or this web site in general. I asked Wes to place just 2 standard value capacitors and inductors in the Figure 10 diplexer design and see what happens.

Here was his response to my request:
OK, here are some "practical values." Note that things don't really change that much. We start with 11.x mH and 2.25 uF. Change the inductor to 10 mH and get Figure 21. Then change the cap to 2.2 uF and see almost no change in Figure 22.

 

But now move into the world of even greater reality and acknowledge that many of the inductors we use at audio are very low Q. Change Qu of L to 10 at 1 kHz, so I put 6.3 Ohms in series with each L to get Figure 23. And do the same thing, but with a dB scale, for Figure 24. Note that we can see the difficulties, but things are still pretty good. We see some loss (about 1 dB) in the low pass path and less than perfect match. But the match is still very good. 20 dB is about 1.1:1 vswr, much better than 99.9% of the hams can really measure. (A 10 dB match is about 2:1.) Hope this is what you were after....Wes

It was and I will use this "practical" diplexer in my next popcorn DC receiver project. Note that the practical diplexer input and output impedance is 50 ohms and the 2.2 uF caps should not be polarized capacitors such as regular electrolytic types which have a positive and negative polarity.

 

Many thanks to Wes Hayward, W7ZOI for his work on this page.
A version of this web page in Russian Cyrillic